StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language - Article Example

Cite this document
Summary
This article called "Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language" describes the variants of the English language. This work argues that Standard English is not superior to Non-standard English and the reasons for why this is the case. The author outlines the differences between them, their peculiarities. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.1% of users find it useful
Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language"

Fabiola Chayele Hoskins College Writing 16 February The Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language The debate surrounding the English language has been going on since the 17th century from the British and passed onto the citizens of the United States shaped around the white man that has run this country through the categorization of either Standard or Nonstandard English (Mufwene, 1999). The major perception is that Standard English language is superior to the Non-standard English. However, the major problem arises from an effort to define what Standard English is, since “it can be difficult to pinpoint its features exactly” (Curzan, 341). Moreover, even though most speakers perceive the Standard English language as superior. Nonetheless, it is essential to understand that this language is neutral by nature, and through the use of it over time will change according to different groups of people and their speaking ability when using it throughout the world. Due to this, David Wallace holds the view that we “cant escape language: Language is everything and everywhere; it is what lets us have anything to do with one another” (41). It would, therefore, be important if altogether. Nevertheless, there is a need to accept the Standard English language as the basis for other English variations that have developed. The English language requires learned usage; it is the proper application pragmatic, and the meaning of words happen as essential elements to communicating in English successfully. Principally because it is the language most widely used in different forms of formal communication, irrespective of what part of the world one resides. However, Curzan seems to hold a different opinion of the use of Standard English altogether. She holds “Standard English and prescriptive grammar are about who has the social power to prescribe and who silences in the process” (Curzan, 877). The essay therefore, argues that Standard English is not superior to Non-standard English and the reasons for why this is the case. According to George Orwell, “Modern English, especially written English, is of bad (Orwell, 1). Therefore, Orwell observes that there is a need to take the necessary trouble to rectify the bad modern English language. Despite this fact, Curzan does not object to Orwell’s idea. Instead, she expresses the opinion that it is not good to emphasize more on the usage of the Standard English language and its prescriptive rules of grammar. She is more interested in preserving the Standard English language in its originality. The argument here is that it is rationally dishonest “to pretend that written Standard English is above question” (Curzan, 871). Her recommendation, therefore, is that students should have adequate opportunity to challenge the rule of Standard English without concern as if they are over ambitious or as though they are breaking a sacred rule. Dennis Freeborn supported Curzan’s opinion in his article published in The Independent Newspaper, in which he argues that the superiority Standard English language is not intrinsic, but rather one that has been determined socially and historically (Freeborn, n.p.). In this respect, the superiority of Standard English undergoes a challenge based on it not carrying its dominance in being a language per se, but merely because it tends to appear superior over other English language variations throughout the course of history. This has been the case because; “written Standard English applies in education, bureaucratic publications. Moreover, other formal documents (Curzan, 873). On the other hand, Orwell is of the opinion that sticking to the rule of Standard English is essential. He owes the sentiments to the fact that it is through learning and observing these rules, that it becomes possible to avoid the many mistakes modern writers are making in delivering their intended messages. Through sticking to the rules of Standard English, Orwell believes that people will be in a better position to express them with more understanding. The main reason is because there are some instances where a person can be in “doubt about the effect of a word or a phrase, and one needs rules to rely on when instinct fails” (Orwell, 7). Therefore, Orwell supports sticking to the rules of Standard English by holding it as the only way better communication happens, especially in writing. However, Curzan holds an objection to this thought. She believes that learning and adhering to the rules of Standard English does nothing other than make English teachers abandon their craft. According to Curzan, it is unfair to ask students to write in a certain language, and not ask them to question the language in which they write. In this respect, “we must negotiate what it means if we want to argue that we must teach Standard English” (Curzan, 347). The perception among many Standard English language speakers is that Non-standard English is Standard English that has become relaxed to include a bevy of slang and grammatical mistakes (Wheeler, 41). However, the only problem is that such Standard English speakers have not understood the fact that there is an incorrect utterance of one form of the English language. The utterances indeed have a correct statement in another type of the language. Therefore, the understanding of one form of English should not be through a process of evaluating and comparing it with another form but understood that each form of English is distinct in its uniqueness and form with its different application rules. The only alteration between Standard English and the Non-standard English variations is largely in the structural differences. A Perfect example of the case evidences how Standard English and African-American English are viewed by the general public” (Mufwene, n.p.). Thus, it means that both forms of English are correct in their different utterances, and not gauged in which one is more correct. It is the misconception that the other variations of the Standard English are simply Standard English full of grammar and lexical mistakes. The ommissions faciliates the need to reform these English forms to allow them to fit into the context of what is considered acceptable within the Standard English language. It, therefore, presents “the lexicographers challenge to be not just accurate and comprehensive, but credible” (Wallace, 58). The development of dictionaries that do not reflect the Standard English language is perceived as a corruption of the language. Hence, forcing the lexicographers to not only seek to develop dictionaries that will reflect accurate Standard English and grammar, but also fit appropriately in the social conception of the accuracy of the language. With regards to Wallace, the term “SNOOTs", in his “Tense Present” essay is a, “really extreme usage fanatic, the sort of person whose idea of Sunday fun is to look for mistakes in Safire’s column’s prose itself”(41). According to “Corpus of Contemporary American English” (COCA), the term “SNOOTitude” is undefined. Wallace makes liberal usage of uncommon words, abbreviations, and acronyms as well as the unusual capitalization of the noun “SNOOT”. The attempt to align with the proclaimed prestige and superiority of the Standard English language has seen many students put more effort and time in studying the prescriptive rules of grammar involved in English. Many of them neglect any other variations. The concept is necessary primarily because most areas where communication happens affecting the news on TV, radio and the newspapers are all written and read in the Standard English. Similar thinking is extended to the political arena and other important social addresses where Standard English applies (Mufwene, n.p.). However, focusing so much on the prescriptive rule of the language is not necessarily beneficial to the linguists and those who care for the natural growth of languages. The focus on African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) and other English variations as word forms of inadequacy is a big misconception. The thinking is people speak these forms of English with a low intellectual capacity for proper Standard English speaking (Wheeler, 42). The African-American Vernacular English and other English dialects are stable variations of the English language with their structure that differs from Standard English. It is, however a representative the English language using its own grammatical and utterance of correctness. Such structural differences do not make the other Non-standard English forms inferior when assessed according to their intrinsic value. The only inferiority between the two forms is that the Standard English language derives from social and historical judgments, since Non-standard English does not prescribe for formal engagements (Santipol, 427). In conclusion, political and social considerations have tended to influence when one form of English qualifies to be a dialect or version of another. The consideration takes place especially in the case when one form is more prestigious than another form based on other people’s contemplations. A classic example is of Standard English and the African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) format, there is no doubt that the later is a dialect of the former (Wheeler, 44). The “chief difference between Standard and Non-standard English variations is not in either way ‘superior or ‘inferior as linguistic structures. The variance occur in the different level of social acceptability” (Santipolo, 403). Therefore, although there is a need to teach Standard English because of its relevance, both in the formal sector and in most global platforms, hence none is unquestionably superior. Differences occur because there is a need to remember that each version of the Non-standard English language constitutes a language in its merit. For that reason, Non-standard English deserves equal consideration. The principal ideas is because “Standard English, despite the pedestal on which we put it, is one dialect among many not the source of all the others (Curzan, 872). Works Cited Curzan, Anne. Teaching the Politics of Standard English. University of Michigan, 2011. 339-351. Print. Curzan, Anne. Says Who? “Teaching and Questioning the Rules of Grammar.” The Modern Language Association of America 124(3), 2009. 870-879. Davies, Mark. (2008-) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Web. 12 Feb. 2015. Freeborn, Dennis. “Letter: The superiority of Standard English.” The Independent, December 15, 1992. Web. February 11, 2015. Mufwene, Salikoko S. Ebonics Or African-American English: Whats In A Name And Can School Systems Ignore It? University of Chicago; Department of Linguistics. Web. February 11, 2015. Mufwene, Salikoko. "EBONICS AND STANDARD ENGLISH IN THE CLASSROOM: SOME ISSUES." Salikoko Mufwene: Ebonics and Standard English in the Classroom: Some Issues. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, 1 Jan. 1999. Web. 11 Feb. 2015. Orwell, George. "Politics and the English Language," 1946. 1-8. Print. Santipolo, Matteo. “On the opposite sides of the continuum: standard British English and cockney. A historical outline of the parallel developments of the two varieties,” 2005. 403-441. Print. Wallace, David F. “Tense Present: Democracy, English, and the Wars over Usage”. Harper Magazine, 2001. 37-58. Print. Wheeler, Rebecca. The Workings of Language. Westport CT: Praeger, 1999, 39-58. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language Article, n.d.)
Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language Article. https://studentshare.org/english/1861043-ebonics-dialect
(Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language Article)
Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language Article. https://studentshare.org/english/1861043-ebonics-dialect.
“Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language Article”. https://studentshare.org/english/1861043-ebonics-dialect.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language

The Popular English Accents

The popular English Accents Name: Institution: THE POPULAR ENGLISH ACCENTS Introduction There are great variations in regional accents for English speakers across regions where the first language is English.... With accents that are believed to have been shaped through many years of history, few nations that speak English have as many varieties of the language in a space as small as the UK (Donn & james, 2011: p25).... hellip; It will also discuss the local varieties of english among different populations of the native speaker....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Living standard of slaves

t could be summarized that racism is the result of having negative judgments, beliefs, and feelings towards certain identifiable groups and this certainly reached its menacing abyss during the slave trade LIVING standard OF SLAVES For a democratic society with its democratic form of government system it is but an obvious choice to opt for a society that is predominantly color blind.... arriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin is such a text that reveals the moral and corporal injury caused due to this racism and it depicts the living standard of slaves during this period....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Foundation for a Strong Intellect

herefore, to sum it up all, it can be said that the early education subjects language arts and maths are very well in accordance with the standard alignments and are in turn helping children grow more and more intellectually and even helps them constantly in academics.... Of the many subjects, we have language Arts and Maths taught to us during our early education. In language arts, we are taught the basic language which in majority of cases is English....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Standard American English and Lyrics of Songs

Therefore, the quote “to the left” according to the standard Britain English, it is incomplete or rather “to the left” can directly and literally mean go to the left.... or an exceptional artist to use African American language, she must have obtained a tremendously prodigious number of fans who understand her language better.... onclusionArtists should reconsider the use of one language that can be understood easily with all people internationally....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Official Status of the English Language

The author states that the official status of the english language is very different in Inner Circle, Outer Circle, and Expanding Circle contexts and identifies how this status shapes the debates over education that arise in different parts of the world.... Therefore, the thought of introducing the same level of the standard cannot be overlooked at some point.... Kachru's Inner Circle represents the English-speaking countries, but with a significant combination of monolingual speakers and speakers of English as a second or third language like New Zealand, Australia, UK, and the US (Hewings and Tagg, 2012, p....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

The Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language

This paper "The Debate Surrounding the Standard and the Non-Standard English Language" discusses the debate surrounding the English language that has been going on for long now, based on its categorization as either standard or non-standard English.... This essay, then, aims to argue that the Standard English language is not superior to non-standard english language.... Most especially, when one language is considered to be more prestigious than the other, a classic example being the Standard english language and the African American Vernacular English, there is no doubt that the later will be considered a dialect of the former....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study

The Suitable Age for Second Language Acquisition

As the paper "The Suitable Age for Second language Acquisition" outlines, one of the most important but widely debated topics in the academic arena is that of acquisition of a Foreign or Second language which most researchers and educationists feel has become a necessity at all levels of education.... hellip; Krashen and Seliger, feel that 'Conscious language Learning' requires error correction as well as rules so that children acquire the second language in the proper manner to enable the right linguistic generalizations....
10 Pages (2500 words) Annotated Bibliography

The Suitable Age for Second Language Acquisition

Butler highlights this fact when he states that all elementary schools have made the english language learning compulsory as they recognize it is important for future success.... … The paper “The Suitable Age for Second language Acquisition” is a  pathetic variant of an annotated bibliography on education.... Second language (L2) acquisition has always been a highly debated topic in the field of education because it has become quite a necessity for children to learn a second language which is one of the requirements for education at all levels....
9 Pages (2250 words) Annotated Bibliography
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us